Connect with us

TECHNOLOGY

Twitter anoints itself arbiter of coronavirus truth with pledge to label even ‘disputed’ & ‘unverified’ claims as disinfo

Published

on



Twitter has expanded its war on Covid-19 wrongthink, announcing it will label “disputed” and “unverified” claims – categories that technically include even the scientific consensus, which has evolved with knowledge of the virus.

The social media platform will label not only “misleading” Covid-19 information – claims experts have determined to be false – but also “disputed” material whose accuracy is uncertain and “unverified” statements that simply haven’t yet been confirmed, Twitter announced in a blog post on Monday.

Offending tweets will feature a label linking to either a curated “Moment”-style Twitter page or an “external trusted source” featuring additional information on the tweet’s content. In the most extreme cases, the tweet will be hidden beneath a warning screen alerting the viewer that “some or all of the content shared in this tweet conflicts with guidance from public health experts” and the user will have to click through to view it.

Yoel Roth, the platform’s head of Site Integrity, promised the new labels would be applied equally to everyone – including world leaders – after he was questioned about whether US President Donald Trump would be allowed to tweet “harmful misleading information.”

Trump’s busy Twitter fingers have caused no end of grief to the mainstream media figures responsible for the care and feeding of the coronavirus narrative, and demands for Twitter to deplatform the president surged especially after he made comments – in a press conference, not on Twitter – that were widely misinterpreted as a recommendation that Covid-19 patients inject disinfectant.

Twitter has been removing tweets that it claimed “incite people to action and cause widespread panic, social unrest, or large-scale disorder” for months under its increasingly stringent Covid-19 misinformation policies. Its admittedly selective enforcement decisions have led to accusations of political bias.

Last week, the platform froze conservative commentator Candace Owens’ account over a tweet calling on Michigan residents to “open [their] businesses” and “go to work,” while other high-profile users including antivirus tycoon John McAfee (who joked that black people couldn’t catch a “Chinese virus”) and former Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke (who urged people to “stop buying toilet paper” and “GO INTO THE STREETS”) have also had tweets removed.

However, under the previous rules, Twitter had pledged to remove only content that included calls for action. While Twitter plans to apply the new wrongthink labels retroactively, it’s unclear how far into the past the platform plans to reach, given that scientific understanding of the epidemic has evolved significantly since it emerged in December.

Much of what was believed to be true when the outbreak became public knowledge has been discarded, from its rate of contagion to the now-infamous models predicting millions of deaths within individual countries. Even the designation of “expert” has been ephemeral – few Twitter users are likely to look to Neil Ferguson, the UK professor who violated the strict lockdown rules he helped devise in order to engage in trysts with his married lover, as a voice of wisdom on public health policy going forward, even if his word was treated as gospel months ago.

Twitter appears to acknowledge the pitfalls of appointing itself sole arbiter of coronavirus truth in a disclaimer toward the end of the post outlining the new rules, referencing the “dynamic situation” and promising to prioritize “review and labeling of content that could lead to increased exposure or transmission.”

While hinting at “internal systems” that will “proactively monitor content” for dissent, Twitter will “continue to rely on trusted partners” to do the heavy lifting of highlighting “content that is likely to result in offline harm,” the company said.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!


TECHNOLOGY

How much YouTube pays for 1 million views, according to creators

Published

on



  • YouTube creators earn money from Google-placed ads on their videos.
  • A number of factors determine how much money they make, including video views.
  • Creators said how much YouTube pays for 1 million views ranged from $3,400 to $30,000.

While many factors — content niche and country, among them — determine how much money a YouTuber earns on any particular video, the number of views it gets is perhaps the most significant.

When a YouTube video hits 1 million views, there’s almost a guaranteed big payday for its creator. In some cases, creators can make five-figures from a single video if it accrues that many views.

Three creators explained how much money YouTube had paid them. YouTube pays $3,400 to $30,000 for 1 million views, these creators said.

When tech creator Shelby Church spoke with Insider, she had earned $30,000 from a video about Amazon FBA (Fulfillment By Amazon). At the time, the video had accrued 1.8 million views.

Her RPM rate — or earnings per 1,000 views — are relatively high, she said, because of her content niche. Business, personal finance, and technology channels tend to earn more per view.

“YouTubers don’t always make a ton of money, and it really depends on what kind of videos you’re making,” she said.

Influencers can earn 55% of a video’s ad revenue if they are part of YouTube’s Partner Program, or YPP. To qualify for the program, they must have 1,000 subscribers and 4,000 hours of watch time on their long-form videos.

They can also make money from shorts, YouTube’s short-form video offering. In order to qualify, creators need to reach 10 million views in 90 days and have 1,000 subscribers. YouTube pools ad revenue from shorts and pays an undisclosed amount to record labels for music licensing. Creators receive 45% of the remaining money based on their percentage of the total shorts views on the platform.

You can share this story on social media:

PLEASANT MUSIC FOR YOUR CAFE, BAR, RESTAURANT, SWEET SHOP, HOME

SUITABLE MUSIC FOR YOGA LOVERS

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!


Continue Reading

TECHNOLOGY

Tesla employees shared sensitive images recorded by cars – Reuters

Published

on



Some pictures were turned into memes and distributed through internal chats, former workers told the agency

Tesla workers shared “highly invasive” images and videos recorded by customers’ electric cars, making fun of them on internal chat groups, several former employees of Elon Musk’s company have told Reuters.

The electric-car manufacturer obtains consent from its clients to collect data from vehicles in order to improve its self-driving technology. However, the company assures owners that the whole system is “designed from the ground up to protect your privacy,” the agency pointed out in its report on Thursday.

According to nine former workers who talked to the agency, groups of employees shared private footage of customers in Tesla’s internal one-on-one chats between 2019 and 2022.

One of the clips in question captured a man approaching his electric car while he was completely naked, one of the sources said.

Tesla recalls over 360,000 cars over self-driving threat

Others featured crashes and road-rage incidents. One particular video of a Tesla hitting a child on a bike in a residential area spread around the company’s office in San Mateo, California “like wildfire,” an ex-employee claimed.

“I’m bothered by it because the people who buy the car, I don’t think they know that their privacy is, like, not respected… We could see them doing laundry and really intimate things. We could see their kids,” another former worker told the agency.

Seven former employees also told Reuters that the software they used at work allowed them to see the location where the photo or video was made, despite Tesla assuring its customers that “camera recordings remain anonymous and are not linked to you or your vehicle.”

The agency noted that it could not obtain any of the pictures or clips described by its sources, who said they were all deleted. Some former employees also told the journalists that they had only seen private data being shared for legitimate purposes, such as seeking assistance for colleagues. Tesla did not respond when approached for comment on the issue by Reuters.

You can share this story on social media!

PLEASANT MUSIC FOR YOUR CAFE, BAR, RESTAURANT, SWEET SHOP, HOME

SUITABLE MUSIC FOR YOGA LOVERS

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!


Continue Reading

TECHNOLOGY

Nordic nation’s military bans use of TikTok – media

Published

on



Sweden’s Defense Ministry has reportedly barred employees from using the Chinese-owned app on their work phones

Sweden’s military has reportedly cracked down on TikTok, decreeing that staff members are no longer allowed to use the Chinese-owned video-sharing application on their devices at work because of security concerns.

The Swedish Defense Ministry on Monday issued its decision, which was viewed by Agence-France Presse, banning the use of TikTok. Security concerns were raised based on “the reporting that has emerged through open sources regarding how the app handles user information and the actions of the owner company, ByteDance,” the ministry said.

The move follows similar restrictions imposed by other EU countries in recent weeks. For example, France banned government employees from downloading “recreational applications,” including TikTok, on their work phones. Norway barred use of the app on devices that can access its parliament’s computer network, while the UK and Belgium banned it on all government phones. Denmark’s Defense Ministry and Latvia’s Foreign Ministry imposed their TikTok bans earlier this month.

China responds to TikTok allegations

“Using mobile phones and tablets can in itself be a security risk, so therefore we don’t want TikTok on our work equipment,” Swedish Defense Ministry press secretary Guna Graufeldt told AFP.

The US, Canada and New Zealand previously banned their federal employees from using TikTok on government-issued devices, citing fears of ByteDance’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Members of Congress may try to ban the app from the US market altogether after testimony at a congressional hearing last week by TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew failed to ease their security concerns. “They’ve actually united Republicans and Democrats out of the concern of allowing the CCP to control the most dominant media platform in America,” US Representative Mike Gallagher said on Sunday in an ABC News interview.

Chinese officials have denied claims that TikTok is used to collect the personal data of its American users. “The Chinese government has never asked and will never ask any company or individual to collect or provide data, information or intelligence located abroad against local laws,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning told reporters last week. She added that Washington has attacked TikTok without providing any evidence that it threatens US security.

PLEASANT MUSIC FOR YOUR CAFE, BAR, RESTAURANT, SWEET SHOP, HOME

SUITABLE MUSIC FOR YOGA LOVERS

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!


Continue Reading

FINANCE

POLITICS

OPINION

LIFE

Trending