SPORTS

Why the IOC Won’t Cancel Japan’s 2020 Olympic Games

Published

3 years ago

July 18, 2021

On July 8, Japan’s government announced that the Summer Olympic Games will be held without spectators due to a spike in coronavirus infections. From the start, Tokyo 2020 has been beset with problems. Originally scheduled for last summer, organizers decided in March 2020 that the pandemic required postponing the event for one year. In the interim, public and official opinion has swung decidedly against the Games. Eighty percent of Japanese people are against the Olympics going ahead. Leading politicians from both the opposition and ruling parties have called for their cancellation, along with the country’s leading newspapers. Major corporations are withdrawing their sponsorships.

Tokyo 2020 will be anything but the global kumbaya envisioned by its organizers, the International Olympic Committee (IOC). Why then, in the face of acts of both God and man, does the IOC persist in moving forward? The answer lies—as with so much of the IOC’s decision making—in the corrupt self-dealing of its senior officials, who routinely put their interests ahead of the public good.

The IOC president, Thomas Bach, and John Coates—who not-so-coincidentally serves as vice president of the IOC, head of the Tokyo 2020 Coordination Commission, head of the Australian Olympic Committee, president of the Court of Arbitration for Sport, and chairman of the Australian Olympic Foundation—don’t want Tokyo 2020 cancelled because it could derail their conspiracy to give the 2032 Summer Games to Brisbane, Australia.

Under new rules governing the bidding process for the Games—which were written by Coates in 2019, when he served as Chair of the IOC’s Legal Affairs Commission and its Working Group for Future Games Elections—the IOC created panels to enter into rolling dialogue with possible candidates for the Summer and Winter Games. The panels can recommend that a host be picked without a contested vote, which is exactly what happened last February, when the IOC’s Future Host Summer Commission designated Brisbane as the “preferred candidate city” to host the 2032 Summer Olympic Games. The IOC’s Executive Board unanimously endorsed the recommendation, and a pro-forma rubber-stamp vote by all IOC members in Tokyo on July 21 is all that remains to complete the coronation.

Bach’s rush to judgement on Brisbane’s bid understandably rankled the other 2032 aspirants. Dagmar Freitag, chair of Germany’s parliamentary sports commission, complained: “The new selection system, praised by IOC president Thomas Bach as ‘more cost-effective and apolitical, and also preventing any unacceptable influence’ can hardly be surpassed in terms of non-transparency.” Another commentator was no less scathing in has assessment. Veteran Olympics watcher and IOC bete-noire Jens Weinrich wrote that Brisbane’s selection was “non-transparent, without competition, without comprehensible criteria.”

The problem for Bach and Coates is that cancellation of the Tokyo Games would reopen the bidding for 2032. Tokyo would throw its hat in the ring and given that all the necessary preparations are already in place, it would take a real stretch of the imagination to dismiss it out of hand. Which explains why, as head the Tokyo 2020 Coordination Commission, Coates was so adamant about holding this year’s games as scheduled.

Selection of host nations for the Olympics has always been a dirty business, one that John Coates knows all too well. As president of the Australian Olympic Committee (AOC) and a leader of the 2000 Sydney bid, Coates admitted to offering $70,000 in inducements to two African members of the IOC the night before Sydney won the 2000 Games by two votes. Coates arranged for the daughter of another IOC member to be enrolled in a home economics course at a Sydney college and had Australia cover the $156,000 cost of gifting seven prized horses to a third IOC member who fancied them.

Ever since Brisbane lost its first bid to host the Summer Games in 1992, Coates has been a man with a mission. His campaign for redemption began in 2015, when he hosted IOC President Bach on a visit to Australia and first floated the idea of the Brisbane Games. Through his careful cultivation of Bach and gaming of the selection process as an IOC insider, he has succeeded in rigging the deck by changing the rules in his favor.

Ruthless, male-dominated autocratic leadership has come to define the business of international sport. Under its previous president, Sepp Blatter, football’s governing body FIFA became the sporting world’s most notorious criminal enterprise. Bach, Coates, and their cabal at the IOC are now running a close second. Their railroading of the Tokyo and Brisbane Games should alarm and outrage any but the most sycophantic of observers.

It’s almost certainly too much to expect that the IOC’s members will reject the Brisbane fait accompli on July 21, but they would do well to reflect on the corrupt house of cards that Bach has built and the disrepute it has brought to the Olympic ideal.

Post Views: 695

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

SPORTS

Olympic medallist calls for Nike boycott

Published

1 year ago

April 8, 2023

The San Francisco Telegraph

Sharron Davies says that the sportswear brand is showing ‘disdain’ for women

Sharron Davies, the former British Olympic swimmer and vocal critic of transgender athletes competing in women’s sports, has called for a boycott of sports apparel giant Nike following its partnership with transgender TikTok personality Dylan Mulvaney.

“Nobody really seems to be listening to the general public,” Davies said on Thursday to GB News. “And that’s what seems to be incredibly frustrating. So, the only way we can actually make these companies and make governments listen is to boycott with our wallets.”

Transgender social media personality Mulvaney – who has also partnered with Bud Light – was featured in Instagram images modelling Nike’s range of sports bras this week, clothing which Davies says “doesn’t apply” to Mulvaney, who has not yet had gender-reassignment surgery.

“It’s just this total disdain with which women are being treated at the moment,” Davies added, “Particularly in the world of sport where physiology makes so much difference.”

Mulvaney has so far not yet commented on the controversy. Anheuser-Busch, which owns Bud Light, said through a spokesperson that the brand “works with hundreds of influencers across our brands as one of the many ways to authentically connect with audiences across various demographics.”

IOC amends transgender guidelines

Transgender participation in sports has become a fiercely-debated issue amid a wave of legislative proposals in Republican-led states in the US which have sought to impose various restrictions on trans athletes’ abilities to participate in female sports.

Schools and colleges in the US, though, would be disallowed from imposing blanket bans on transgender athletes as part of a provision to existing gender-equity legislation proposed this week by the Biden administration.

Another former Olympic athlete, Caitlyn Jenner, who is transgender, has also joined in the chorus of backlash against Nike, whom she described as “woke” and said that “inclusivity” should not come at the expense of the majority of people.

Like Davies, Jenner has been a noted critic of transgender athletes competing in sports against biologically-born women. Jenner did note, however, that she has no issue with Mulvaney pursuing sponsorship deals, as she has done herself in the past.

Vivek Ramaswamy, the GOP presidential candidate noted for his opposition to so-called ‘wokeism,’ has also expressed his opposition to Nike’s deal with Mulvaney, calling it the “worst kind of woke capitalism.”

You can share this story on social media!

PLEASANT MUSIC FOR YOUR CAFE, BAR, RESTAURANT, SWEET SHOP, HOME

SUITABLE MUSIC FOR YOGA LOVERS

Post Views: 728

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

SPORTS

IOC cannot be ‘political referee’ – president

Published

1 year ago

March 23, 2023

The San Francisco Telegraph

The International Olympic Committee has defended plans to include Russian and Belarusian athletes at the Paris 2024 Games

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) must not act as a “political referee,” according to its president, Thomas Bach. The organization has faced a backlash for its plans to reinstate Russian and Belarusian athletes to international competition ahead of the Paris Games in 2024.

Speaking at the Ruhr Political Festival in Essen, Germany on Wednesday, Bach said that the IOC must stay out of political disputes to preserve its power as a unifying force on the international stage.

“If politics decides who can take part in a competition, then sport and athletes become tools of politics,” Bach stated. “It is then impossible for sport to transfer its uniting power.”

However, he added that the IOC must be “politically neutral but not apolitical.”

The IOC imposed sporting sanctions against Russia and Belarus shortly after Moscow launched its military campaign in Ukraine last year. The measures were subsequently adopted by numerous other sporting federations across the globe, and severely restricted the participation of Russian and Belarusian athletes in international competitions.

UK asks Olympic sponsors to ‘pressure’ IOC – media

Despite Bach stating earlier this year that he believes sanctions should continue against the governments of both Russia and Belarus, he has appeared open to allowing athletes from both countries back to Olympic competition under certain criteria, such as participating under a neutral flag and appearing in Asian-based qualification events ahead of the Paris Games next year.

Bach claimed on Wednesday that the current situation presents his organization with a “dilemma,” noting that Ukraine has demanded “the total isolation of all Russians” from global sport. He further stated that the IOC has a responsibility towards “human rights and the Olympic Charter” – and not towards the “total isolation of people with a specific passport.”

Elsewhere, Bach has faced resistance from the likes of the British government, amid reports earlier this month that it had petitioned major Olympics sponsors to pressure the IOC to maintain its hardline stance against Russia and Belarus.

Bach’s latest comments came as “several dozen” people held a protest outside Essen’s Philharmonic Music Hall, some of whom were Ukrainian refugees, according to Reuters. Ukraine has threatened to boycott the Paris Olympics if a complete ban on Russia and Belarus is not upheld.

PLEASANT MUSIC FOR YOUR CAFE, BAR, RESTAURANT, SWEET SHOP, HOME

SUITABLE MUSIC FOR YOGA LOVERS

Post Views: 692

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

SPORTS

Olympics chief responds to Ukraine’s boycott calls

Published

1 year ago

February 14, 2023

The San Francisco Telegraph

International Olympic Committee (IOC) President Thomas Bach has criticized Ukraine’s calls to boycott the Paris 2024 Games if Russian athletes are allowed to take part. The role of the Olympics is to unify, not escalate and contribute to confrontation, he said.

“It’s not up to governments to decide who can take part in which sports competitions because this would be the end of international sport competitions… as we know it,” Bach told journalists on Sunday.

In late January, the IOC said it may allow athletes from Russia and Belarus who do not publicly support Moscow’s military operation in Ukraine to participate in the 2024 Summer Olympics under a neutral flag.

The announcement angered Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, who called on countries to boycott the Games if this happens. Speaking on Friday, Zelensky said the presence of Russian athletes would be a “manifestation of violence” that “cannot be covered up with some pretended neutrality or a white flag.”

In comments cited by France 24, Bach stated that “history will show who is doing more for peace, the ones who try to keep lines open and communicate or the ones who want to isolate and divide.”

Our role is bringing people together.

Ukraine’s calls for a boycott of the Summer Olympics go against the “principles we stand for,” he said.

IOC president blasts Ukraine – media

Bach added that these calls are premature, saying: “we are talking about the sporting competitions to take place this year. There is no talk about Paris yet, this will come much later.”

In deciding the fate of Russian and Belarusian athletes, the IOC must address the “serious concerns” of the UN Human Rights Council that banning them “only because of their passports is a violation of their rights,” he explained.

“We have seen a Belarusian player under neutral status winning the Australian Open. So why shouldn’t it be possible in a swimming pool for instance, or in gymnastics?” the IOC chief said. He was referring to the success of tennis star Aryna Sabalenka, who won the Australian Open in Melbourne last month.

Bach added, however, that Ukrainian athletes should “know how much we share their grief, their human suffering and all the effort we’re taking to help them” as a result of the conflict.

SUITABLE MUSIC FOR YOGA LOVERS